On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, laurent laffont <[email protected]
> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:04 AM, laurent laffont <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think about adding these packages as default in Pharo 1.2:
>>> - ConfigurationOfMocketry
>>> - ConfigurationOfXMLSupport
>>> - ConfigurationOfCryptography  (does'nt exist yet, planned to be created
>>> in a local coding-dojo on Tuesday).
>>>
>>> Motivations:
>>> - XMLSupport and Cryptography are often needed to consume web services
>>> - Mocketry because I want to write tests using Mocks and it's easier to
>>> work when tools are in standard Pharo (and then newcomers can see Mocketry
>>> examples).
>>>
>>>
>>> I will update ConfigurationOfPharo 1.2 (beta3 ?) if people agree.
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Laurent. I agree it would be nice to include those 3 projects in
>> PharoDev.  Do they have tests? are they all green in pharo 1.2?
>>
>
>
> - ConfigurationOfMocketry has 479 tests, all green now in Pharo 1.2  +
> HelpSystem help.
> - ConfigurationOfXMLSupport version: '1.0.2' has 32 tests, all green (but
> blessing is #development so I don't know if we can include it). version
> 1.0.0 has 8 tests, green.
> - ConfigurationOfAutotest: 27 tests green + HelpSystem help.
>
>
Hi Laurent. I think both kind of tools are important for doing business in
Pharo: test and XML support. Both have been asked several times in the
mailing list. Having them in the dev image would be easier for this point of
view, and users can help detecting bugs, using it, etc.

I would include those 3 projects in the PharoDev. So, go ahead and add it in
ConfigurationOfPharo. We can always go back.

For Autotest, what I suggest is to have it in the image, but not enable by
default. THose who want to use it, just open the settings browser and enable
it.


> For Cryptography I've started to look at it but there's some work to be
> done: there's only one packages with all algorithms + tests + core. So it
> should be splitted. You are right about MD5 (splitting should resolve this).
> Actually 10 tests out of 102 fail.
>
>
For the Cryptography  I would wait a bit, as you say. Because in pharo core
we already have the package System-Hashing ... so I am not sure how to deal
with it.

Cheers

Mariano


> Laurent
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> If true, and people agree, please feel free to update ConfigurationOfPharo
>>
>> I didn't check ConfigurationOfCryptography  but I remember that MD5 and
>> few other classes where already integrated in PharoCore. We should avoid
>> collisions. Are those classes still alive in the Cryptography  package?
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> mariano
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Laurent Laffont
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to