I was just reading the code with olivier auverlot. I would love to have a small if possible replacement to the HTTPSocket
Stef > Hi, > > Maybe I am a bit late with this question, I also don't know who makes the > decision, and it is probably external people who have to make the judgement, > but would it be possible and/or a good idea to include Zinc HTTP Components > into Pharo 1.2 Dev ? > > In any case, the code is in good shape, works on 1.2, has a reasonable number > of tests, has comments, is pretty small and elegant. > > Whether or not to load the Zinc-Patch-HTTPSocket package is another question. > This package patches (destructively overwrites) class methods in HTTPSocket, > redirecting them to ZnHTTPSocketFacade, effectively steering all HTTP client > access in your Smalltalk image through Zinc HTTP Components. This has been > working for me for months, but my usage is certainly not universal. So maybe > this should remain an option. > > I would especially like to expose this code to more people to get more > feedback. I am also willing to keep on supporting the code. > > What do you think ? > > Sven > > > >
