On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Dale Henrichs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Haha, > > Perhaps there should also be a rating for class comments ... G, PG, R, > NSFW... > We can vote on 1st March to deliver the "Best Comment Of The Month" Award :) Laurent > > Dale > > > On 02/07/2011 12:07 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> this is more HTTPSocket >> I'm sure that philippe will love to answer :) >> >> Stef >> >> >> On Feb 7, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote: >> >> Actually, can somebody explain the troll-mode comment? Why is the >>> HTTPClient an example of how not to write code? Should we not be using >>> this package in production? What does the comment about "hacker with >>> telnet"-protocol mean? >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Luc Fabresse<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/2/7 laurent laffont<[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> FYI I put results >>>>> here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks Laurent. >>>> It is a really great because it document the system and I learn a lot at >>>> the >>>> same time ;-) >>>> #Luc >>>> >>>> >>>>> Laurent >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> :) >>>>>> We should just merge the two :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <trollmode> >>>>>>>>> I'm a good example of how not to write code. Turn around, walk >>>>>>>>> away, >>>>>>>>> fast. I'm fully of bugs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Somebody at some point thought that HTTP is a simple "hacker with >>>>>>>>> telnet"-protocol. It's not. >>>>>>>>> </trollmode> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's actually HTTPSocket, not HTTPClient. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Although it is a negative comment, it is the truth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Still, adding some comments and lowering the pain for others is still >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> good idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
