Hi! On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > It seems to me that there are problems due to the merging of Keymapping sub > packages into one Keymapping package: > - first, camillo seems to publish in Keymapping, while Guillermo publishes > in Keymapping-*. This means that one or the other will most certainly lose > code. > Actually, we had a couple of problems: - I saw the changes made by Camillo, but his version is broken and it was not working. - I couldn't merge some changes I did because we did not get really synchronized at first. - We want to change the same things, but we don't like each other's solution nor process of development :$. > - second, the version published by Camillo reached > Keymapping-CamilloBruni.3, but there already were versions that reached > Keymapping-cds.113, which makes Monticello list the new commits by Camillo > at the bottom > > Would it be possible if you two would get synchronized? > > > Also, ConfigurationOfKeymapping is still broken: > - loading "(self project version: '1.5') load" still raises the > Character>>+ problem due to the initialization > - however, loading "(self project version: '1.5-baseline') load" works > because it takes the new versions into account > > Would it be possible to update the configuration? > > I created development version 1.6, which contains a lot of refactorings already. It's preety better. I removed the string matching between shortcuts, and the ugly selectors to look at the match of a mapping. I'd like it to reviewed... > > Cheers, > Doru > > > Cheers, Guille > On 14 Mar 2011, at 15:20, Camillo Bruni wrote: > > > > > On 2011-03-14, at 15:17, Tudor Girba wrote: > > > >> I saw :). Just two questions: > >> - Is the ConfigurationOfKeymapping updated? > > > > that I pushed to the existing branch > > > >> - Is it already usable? > > not yet, didn't have too much time so far, but the basic tests are > working. > > the interface will stay the same, but the internals will be much cleaner > and more explicit > > > >> Cheers, > >> Doru > >> > >> > >> On 14 Mar 2011, at 15:15, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >> > >>> I pushed everying into a single Keymapping package for now. As soon as > there is full functionality we should separate it again. > >>> > >>> > >>> camillo > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2011-03-13, at 22:40, Tudor Girba wrote: > >>> > >>>> Excellent initiative Camillo! > >>>> > >>>> Regarding multiple packages: Having multiple packages limits the > conflicts, and saving them individually (for now) it's a small price to pay. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Doru > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 13 Mar 2011, at 22:28, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> furthermore, lets use a single repos/package (or whatever this is > called in MC). > >>>>> I do not like to commit 3 times while refactoring. > >>>>> later on we can still split it up so people can actually decide on > what to load. > >>>>> > >>>>> camillo > >>>>> > >>>>> On 2011-03-13, at 22:20, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I can push my changes. but I don't think we should rely too much on > your old code. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Im trying to keep the structure of the classes, that was already > very nice IMO. > >>>>>> I manly adress the following issues: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - use of arrays as result (dedicatet results object) > >>>>>> - string to match the shortcuts with the incoming keyboard event > (dropped all of that and started to work on tests to use the shortcuts > directly) > >>>>>> - weird event matching directly on morph (simplified and using a > recursive function call now) > >>>>>> - horrible unreadable variable names (wherever I started I tried to > put long names to make the code readable) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I suggest we can work together on the new code base, since the > interface will stay fairly compatible. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> camillo > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2011-03-13, at 22:08, Guillermo Polito wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Camillo, I was fixing some tests and going to refactor some ugly > parts of > >>>>>>> the package. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is there a way to join forces so we don't step into the other work? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Guille > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Camillo Bruni < > camillo.br...@inria.fr>wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I started on the last Lille sprint a complete rewrite of the > Keymapping > >>>>>>>> package. As of now it is not yet functional but the growing > test-coverage > >>>>>>>> should help to solve this issue. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> m(^_-)m > >>>>>>>> camillo > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 2011-03-03, at 15:16, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Right, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> the stable has a preconditio which limits it to pharo 1.2. > >>>>>>>>> Furthermore the initialization code seems to be incompatible as > it uses > >>>>>>>> to:do: on Character which is AFAIK not implemented in the core > image Pharo > >>>>>>>> 1.3. Hence apply the following changes: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> KMKeyEvent class >> initializeControlSequences > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>> $a asciiValue to: $z asciiValue do: [:each | > >>>>>>>>> d add: each asCharacter -> (each - $a asciiValue + 1)]. > >>>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> then it should work. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> m(^_-)m > >>>>>>>>> camillo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 2011-03-03, at 09:25, Tudor Girba wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I am very interested to get Keymapping integrated into Glamour. > Could > >>>>>>>> someone help me to load it? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I tried: > >>>>>>>>>> - in Pharo 1.2: > >>>>>>>>>> Gofer it squeaksource: 'Keymapping'; package: > >>>>>>>> 'ConfigurationOfKeymapping'; load. > >>>>>>>>>> (ConfigurationOfKeymapping project version: #stable) load > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> - in Pharo 1.3: > >>>>>>>>>> Gofer it squeaksource: 'Keymapping'; package: > >>>>>>>> 'ConfigurationOfKeymapping'; load. > >>>>>>>>>> (ConfigurationOfKeymapping project version: '1.5') load > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>> Doru > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 27 Feb 2011, at 09:59, Tudor Girba wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I also I cannot load Keymapping 1.5 in Pharo 1.2. I get DNU for > >>>>>>>> Character>>+. This is due to an initialization in KMKeyEvent (see > the > >>>>>>>> attached debug log). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I did the followings: > >>>>>>>>>>> Gofer it > >>>>>>>>>>> squeaksource: 'Keymapping'; > >>>>>>>>>>> package: 'ConfigurationOfKeymapping'; > >>>>>>>>>>> load. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> (ConfigurationOfKeymapping project version: #stable) load > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Am I missing something, or is this version not supposed to work > in > >>>>>>>> Pharo 1.2? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>> Doru > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> <PharoDebug.log> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 26 Feb 2011, at 21:08, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> You're telling me that if i do a clean installation of 1.5 it > would > >>>>>>>> work? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Francisco > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Guillermo Polito > >>>>>>>>>>>> <guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm, If you had 1.4 and updated to 1.5, you will have some > problems > >>>>>>>> because > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I did some refactorings on that... :/. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <patchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guille i was using 1.4 and worked excellent, just tried 1.5 > and on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> every stroke i made i've got a DNU on #realtarget > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Installed on last PharoCore 1.2, should i try it on 1.3? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great work, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fran > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:29 AM, laurent laffont > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <laurent.laff...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Guillermo Polito > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do we have now? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Can provide settings for a set of morphs > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Can provide settings for a TextEditors (Smalltalk editor > and > >>>>>>>> related) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Settings integration > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added some methods to the Settings Tree Builder in order > to > >>>>>>>> avoid > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> references from the users code. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I ran Slint over it and cleaned it a lot more :). ( And > learnt > >>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slint is there :P ) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More info in here: http://guilleel3.blogspot.com/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A new blog, cool ! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I have Emacs-like keybinding in code editor, to switch > browser, > >>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laurent. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guille > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> "Every thing has its own flow." > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> "Every thing should have the right to be different." > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>>> > >>>> "Value is always contextual." > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> www.tudorgirba.com > >> > >> "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, > >> you will end up with a messy haircut." > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Some battles are better lost than fought." > > > > >
