On Mar 25, 2011, at 4:12 02PM, Henrik Johansen wrote:

> 
> On Mar 25, 2011, at 4:09 51PM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:48 33PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>   fixObsoleteReferences only fixes CompiledMethods, doesn't it ?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> yep.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And the trick to find them is to inspect
>>> 
>>> SystemNavigation default obsoleteClasses first allInstances 
>>> 
>>> and then use the "explore pointers" on that.
>>> 
>>>     Marcus
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Soooo...
>> WordArrayForSegment in System-Object Storage is now a subclass of 
>> AnObsoleteWordArray?
>> 
>> What on earth did that update try to do? ;)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Henry
> 
> Oh, move it from one category to another.
> 
> Figures that's so complicated an operation it would break all subclasses etc.
> 
> Cheers,
> Henry

Why move them to begin with btw?
Are they not arrayed?
Isn't ByteArray "native" too, following whatever rationale was followed when 
moving Word/Float/IntegerArrays there?
How about the rest of the variable Word/Byte subclasses?

This way just looks silly, imho...

Cheers,
Henry

Reply via email to