"Stéphane Ducasse“ wrote: > > I would really like to remove the standard squeak because it is terrible. > I set it up since some updates and > I cannot work with it anymore. >
No, it is not terrible. It is very beautiful, and much more useful and innovative than for example fake-windows or fake-macos themes. People like me who came to Pharo after you forked from Squeak have no idea of your quarrels with the Squeak-Community (i only read it afterwards in the mailing-lists) and have therefore no problem with using the best from every implementation (the beautiful theme from squeak and the random refactorings from pharo ;) And while i would have no problem with loading the theme by hand — if i would remove themes it would not be the squeak theme.. Have a look at: http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/17/princeton-study-shows-that-easy-fonts-make-things-harder-to-reme/ Princeton study shows that easy fonts make things harder to remember: "Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized)" -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/who-is-using-softSqueak-and-standard-Squeak-tp3407241p3415787.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
