Discussion finished. Marcus, can we add in the PharoDev images a installScript.st with the code that was executed to generate the image? yes, the ConfigurationOfPharo load....
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Miguel Cobá <[email protected]> wrote: > installScript definitely yes. > > changelog is useful if it is accurate and maintained else better avoid > it. Packages I never found a reason for it to be in the zip. not very > useful for newbies because they don't now what a package is based only > in the name and for a experimented user, they can find the packages > directly in the image. > > So, I think that they won't be missing. > > Cheers > > El sáb, 12-03-2011 a las 20:13 +0100, Mariano Martinez Peck escribió: > > In Pharo 1.0 and 1.1 I used to include certain files in addition to > > the .image and .changes. These files were: changelog.txt, > > installScript.st and packages.txt > > So...what do you think? are they (still) useful ? if true, then we > > should add it to hudson. If not, we just ignore it. > > > > Thanks > > > > Mariano > > -- > Miguel Cobá > http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
