Why omnibrowser is bad? Is omnibrowser idea for building browsers failed? 2011/4/6 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>
> It is not. > The idea is to have a default browser and set of tools that we can use > in bare core image and that are not based on toolBuilder or stringHolder. > After if Glamour produces a nice IDE then we can load it and use it. > In addition benjamin is fixing a lot of problems in default widgets like > multiple selection, > hilighting.... > > Stef > > > Hi, how does it relate to glamourost? > > > > thanks, > > Mike > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > > <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> > >> On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Guys, > >>> > >>> Maybe I missed part of the discussion, but what is Nautilus? > >> > >> A new browser :) > >> Supporting > >> - groups > >> - package > >> - declarative menus > >> - environment selection > >> - scoped actions > >> - soon refactoring > >> > >> but right now a bit too slow because of the HUGGGGGGEEEEEE trees build > by TreeMorphTreeMorph > >> > >>> Squeaksource simply says "A new browser" > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Alexandre > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
