2011/4/20 Dale Henrichs <dhenr...@vmware.com>: > > It's just an added dimension of complexity ... not to mention the cost of > converting existing development processes, tools, artifacts to the new > system...it took Monticello nearly a decade to become commonly used:) > > I think that this is a problem that does need to be solved (along with > others:) so I'm not claiming that "all is lost, we'll never be file-based" I > just think it is a tough problem that would have been solved by now, if it > was easy:) >
A thing I not understand is why we need to go "file-based" if we are already object based (several steps ahead)? > Until then, long live SqueakSource3 and SmalltalkHub:) > Sure! But, (I'm only asking) we couldn't using Git with objects? It's only curiosity, not that I would like Git, eheh, I knew Github only today! Germán.
