Me too. I would rollback until we have a better solution and very well tested. I think right now the consequences and worst than the original problem.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > 1) have a fast/normal recompileAll > > 2) not to loose source code > > > > If the only way right now is rollbacking #dropSourcePointer and > rollbacking the implementation in objects as methods, please do it. Right > now we are in the worst case. For example, today when I discover the bug of > loosing sources...I commit my own package with a lots of methods with the > decompiled source...it took time to fix it. So I think it is important to > fix this. > > > I think we should roll back the change for now... > > All this shows that the source handling is *far* too complex... How would > we realize source handling *today* considering today's resources? (aka: > compression is free and memory even > on last year's cell phone 20 times larger than our complete system...) > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
