On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Lukas Renggli <reng...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The problem is that both #/* and #/* are valid binary operators, so
> they don't work well for comments.
>
> I don't really remember what I proposed a few years ago, although I
> remember that exactly the same proposal was made. What would work is
> to use something like "* and *" (or any other double thing that starts
> with a double quote). Like this the comments could contain double
> quotes.
>

Gilad Bracha chose (* & *) for Newspeak.  These are not valid binary
selectors and * can't follow ( in valid code.  A good choice.


>
> As a short term solution you can also put your comments into single
> quotes. Unused string literals are removed by the compiler.
>
> Lukas
>
> On 31 October 2011 22:00, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>
> wrote:
> > Me too.
> >
> > Sean lukas proposed a syntax for that in the mailing-list a year ago.
> > If you find it please resent it.
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> >
> >> Would it be difficult/valuable to create an alternate comment syntax? I
> often
> >> find myself wanting to comment a large block itself containing
> comments. It
> >> would be nice to have something like C++'s /* */. I feel like this may
> have
> >> been brought up before, but couldn't find it searching the lists.
> >>
> >> Sean
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/Comment-Syntax-tp3961451p3961451.html
> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot

Reply via email to