On 2012-01-19, at 14:21, Henrik Johansen wrote: > On Jan 19, 2012, at 2:05 41PM, Camillo Bruni wrote: >> I am currently doing a small refactoring of FSFilesystem. >> Does anybody need explicitly FSLocator? >> >> Otherwise I'd vouch for removing it.. >> >> >> best >> cami >> > Why? > > Seems kinda nice to me to be able to specify locations relative to > image/vm/desktop etc without having to worry about those locations changing > when you load the image on a different platform.
Sure sure, I wouldn't remove the functionality. But I would rather like to introduce a custom PathType to reflect named paths. I just feel uncomfortable with FSLocator being almost the same as an FSReference but they're not completely interchangeable. cami
