>> Ironically this proposition would make some Monticello operations >> slower, because Monticello will need to download and open all versions >> with the same name to figure out if the ancestry matches. >> >> Furthermore, this would subtly break many tools, because most of them >> do not look at the ancestry but only at the filename (again to make it >> fast). >> >> Last but not least, the proposal will annoy people that want to >> integrate changes and that cannot because a file with that name is >> already in their repository. > > Can we then do nothing at all ?
Commit speed has never been a problem to me. > What about changing the naming, like adding an extra UUID to the name ? That would have been a solution before all tools started to depend on the naming. > Don't _you_ have any ideas about speeding up Monticello ? Use Monticello 2 that addresses this and many other problems of Monticello 1. But then people also criticize Monticello 2 because it addresses this problem, and version data is not human readable anymore. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
