On 31 January 2012 16:16, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Frank Shearar wrote: > >> On 31 January 2012 14:44, S Krish <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I agree whole heartedly after a month of Pharo being used as a tool for >>> newbies. >>> >>> a) Crashes... > > Make sure to run an up-to-date vm and image (and yes, the downloads are not > up to date...) > > And it's important that people report problems. If problems are not reported, > it is as if they > would not exist. > >>> b) Bugs in basic functionality: Morphic as well as in other places > Morphic is just crap. But what can we do else than slowly fixing what we see? > >>> c) The User Guide is not in synch with the current stable Pharo.. in simple >>> images of browsers.. > We just can't update pharo by example for every release... the day has just > 24 hours. > But it is true that the version right now is far too old. (based on a horibly > slow 1.0 with > a completely different browser...) > > > In general there are two options: > > -> give up and do something else > -> fix the problems, step by step. >
there's third option: - give up and fix problems step by step :) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
