That looks like a winner. I'll try a test when I'm really awake. Sorry to be dense, but I'm trying to help w/o doing anything awful in the process.
Thanks! Bill ________________________________ From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Nick Ager [nick.a...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 3:38 AM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Alternative to MC for upload? curl -T GiveThisToStef.mcz http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox On 6 February 2012 08:35, Nick Ager <nick.a...@gmail.com<mailto:nick.a...@gmail.com>> wrote: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=webdav+command-line http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1205101/command-line-utility-for-webdav-upload On 6 February 2012 07:59, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu<mailto:bsch...@anest.ufl.edu>> wrote: In honor of Stef, let's make this *really* simple. The pieces for what I want to do MUST exist; I just don't see how to make it happen. So let's say I have GiveThisToStef.mcz on my drive, and I have checked, and rechecked that it is clean and releasable. Can I use an FTP client or some other command line tool to put that in the in box? That way, the code will be where everyone wants it (vs. just attached to email here), and I won't have to worry about what MC might be doing that I didn't anticipate. I know MC can do the whole thing - trouble is it once did something I didn't expect, and I can't have that (legal exposure). I want a clear wall that I deliberately penetrate when I have something to share - it's that simple. Bill ________________________________ From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr> [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr>] on behalf of Nick Ager [nick.a...@gmail.com<mailto:nick.a...@gmail.com>] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:04 AM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Alternative to MC for upload? Hi, For private code I began by using an ftp repository then switched to a WebDAV server, With a private WebDAV server you can use Monticello, Gofer etc as though you are using squeak-source - though without a front-end. If you want a front-end there is squeak-source 3 [1] Nick [1] http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/ss3.html/Overview On 5 February 2012 18:03, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu<mailto:bsch...@anest.ufl.edu>> wrote: You're not daft; I'm simply looking for suggestions; yours counts :) ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr> [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr>] on behalf of Göran Krampe [go...@krampe.se<mailto:go...@krampe.se>] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 12:12 PM To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Alternative to MC for upload? On 02/05/2012 12:30 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a fair amount of code that I can't/don't dare release because it > involves intellectual property that I do not own, and access under > non-disclosure agreements (some of which are silly, but need to be > respected regardless). None of that code it is relevant to you (unless > you do heart surgery at home), but I need to keep it separate from > things like GSL, PLplot, FFI tweaks, etc., that should interest the > community. > > In the past, I've saved to http repositories and been surprised at > things (fortunately, nothing toxic) that were released w/o my intent. > Squeak Source long since lost the code in question, but it put a fear of > MC in me. > > Is there a way to use gofer or something else to send specific .mcz > files that I want to make available? Some other tool? Perhaps I am daft - but why don't you use either local directories for those packages or a private ftp server (like I do)? I use pure-ftpd which is really nice because it can easily map specific users to specific "home directories". regards, Göran
