On Aug 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, GOUBIER Thierry wrote: > Is this the reason why when I built my package tree in the AltBrowser, I get > four packages (X, X-A, X-B, X-C) but X contains all the classes of X-A, X-B > and X-C ?
Which package classes? because MC use a pattern matching based on category names and explicitly MCworking copy So if you declare an MC package we name X and X-A indeed you are in trouble. The point with RPackage is to avoid the pattern matching approach of MC and to get rid of the scan of all categories. > Is this the reason why, in the current Alt-Browser packages, there is an > auto-creation of an Alt package when you load it ? > > I also get confused by the relation between class categories and packages. Is > there a plan to get rid of class categories ? yes > At the moment, if you create then unload a package, the system categories > stay behind (Pharo 2.0). > > Thierry > ________________________________________
