On 3 September 2012 04:34, Lawson English <lengli...@cox.net> wrote: > On 9/2/12 6:32 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> i was in a mood of making some overhauls.. >> so as result i refurbished a type system a bit.. >> removed all bogus C-like class names , e.g. NBUnsignedIntType ... >> [...] >> >> P.P.S. i would really like some help with testing what i did, >> including writing some more tests to cover type system more >> broadly (now since type names follow certain naming rule, many >> different types can be checked without much coding) > > > I'm working up a set of methods (you've seen a few of them) to demo the > syntax of how to use the assembler. Perhaps that can be used as part of the > testing?
Of course they can. Anything which tries to do something without using common code paths is welcome. > > Also, I haven't checked , but are the MMX/SMP instruction sets implemented > yet? > I don't remember. x86 has a lot of instructions. (and poor documentation). > If not, do you have a timeframe for when you might get around to it? My own > intuition is that these are where people will get the most benefit from > using the assembler anyway. > My current interests lying elsewhere.. but hey, if someone needs them feel free to add support in assembler.. Dont wait for me :) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
