On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 16:44, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On 6 December 2012 16:28, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Wait, all delays are signaled when the image is saved? So, if I have a > >> > five > >> > minute delay in a process and I save the image 2 seconds later... > >> > > >> > [ d := 5 minutes asDelay. > >> > d wait. > >> > Transcript logCr: 'asd' ] fork. > >> > > >> > Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: false. > >> > > >> > That is a limitation but is also a bug :/... > >> > > >> no.. they are not.. sorry my first comment was not correct.. i > >> corrected myself in followup :) > > > > > > I understand the 1 delay<->1 semaphore. But I am not creating several > ones. > > What if a second process saves the image while another one is waiting? > > > > This piece of code shows that problem. > > > > [ d := 5 minutes asDelay. > > d wait. > > Transcript logCr: 'asd' ] fork. > > Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: false. > > > > It will not honor the delay :/ > > > ah.. ok. then that's indeed a problem. > about not honors: is it signal it prematurely or not signaling it at all? > > prematurely :) > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > >
