On Jan 23, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry for the late reply. > >> how Loom compares with the fixes that andreas added to the default profiler. > > I am not sure about Andreas' fixes.
this is why it would be nice that you know because you should be the profiler expert :) > Loom tells you for each thread running in the VM the amount of CPU it > consumes. > Some screenshots should be self explaining: > http://objectprofile.com/loom-screenshots.html > >> I do not know if the code is in squeak because this code was licensed under >> GPL. > > Loom is MIT. > >> But I would like to know if your profiler takes into account the problems >> solved by andreas. > > Any ref about this? look into the list it was mentioned. > >> I did not see an announce of Loom (by the way Loom is the name of large oo >> memory developed by the original smalltalk team >> a while ago). >> >> http://objectprofile.com/loom-download.html >> >> I'm know that some people got problem with our profiler and I would like to >> see how we >> can improve it. > > We haven't announced Loom because the Pharo version is not yet ready. > Although usable, it has a very poor graphical user interface. > The first goal is to have Loom replace the standard process browser. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > >
