Ok so it would be good to address the issue. We should get better and larger collection choice. Since you already add a look could you check it again.
Stef On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:49 AM, Clément Bera wrote: > Actually this was in the bug tracker > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2759&can=1&q=orderedDictionary&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Milestone%20Difficulty > > error 2759 > > This OrderedIdentityDictionary is only used for user interface that is why it > is on Spec-Core for now. See the bug report for more details. > > 2013/1/31 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > > > The class "OrderedIdentityDictionary" is currently defined in package > > "Spec-Core". > > > > Since it is useful also in other scenarios and I do not want a dependency > > on spec: wouldnt it make sense to move it to a more common "Collections-..." > > package. > > good idea. > Do you know the test coverage of the class? > Because it would be nice to run hapao on it and write some tests if there are > none. > > > > > Since there is already "Collections-Unordered" I would suggest to put it > > into "Collections-Ordered". > > Mmmhh ... but then class OrderedCollection would have to move from > > "Collections-Sequenceable" > > to "Collections-Ordered" as well (at least from the name). > > > > Any comments on that... > > > > Thx > > T. > > > > >
