On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi, > > 1) CI builds names is not the same than app names. > 2) The "official" pharo vm (the NB Cog JIT), should be named just "Pharo", > because that is what users will see in his dock bar. > 3) The stack VM is not a debug vm is just a VM who uses a > stack-to-register approach. I would call it PharoS or something that simple. > No. The StackVM is a VM that optimizes interpreted execution by mapping contexts to stack frames and lazily instantiating contexts, but is still a pure interpreter. The Cog VM is a VM that optimizes execution by mapping contexts to stack frames and lazily instantiating contexts, /and/ by compiling methods used more than once to machine-code and implementing a number of send optimization schemes in that machine-code. 4) RizelVM is not a regularly distributed VM, so it should not be in pharo, > but in pharo-contribution > 5) PLEASE, STOP MARKING ISSUES THAT CAN WAIT AS 2.0!!!! We are just 2 > weeks of release. Stop adding new tasks. No matter if you think is > important. Unless it will block us to release, IT IS NOT. > > Thanks, > Esteban > > > On Feb 5, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We should really decide on this: > https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7423 > > > > I guess that would simplify the choice for newcomers significantly! > > > -- best, Eliot