+9000 Ben
On Feb 10, 2013, at 5:45 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2013-02-10, at 17:42, Frank Shearar <frank.shea...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10 February 2013 16:25, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Why does SystemNavigation >> #allSelect: return strings of the form 'Array >>> at:' instead of the real methods? >> >> Probably because the things that use SystemNavigation - Browsers, >> MessageSets and the like - want to render lists of things to the user. >> >> There is one advantage to dumb strings, which is that it's easy to >> make a SystemNavigation that works against a remote image. But that's >> not much to go on. Changing these kinds of methods to return >> MethodReferences might be a useful middle ground (and permit easy >> extension to remote tools). >> >> I mention remote tools because I hacked up a proof of concept a while >> back that turned a Browser into one that could access a suitably >> prepared image through an HTTP API. Development stalled because the >> reflection machinery's API is a bit... involved, and it was dog slow, >> but I could browse anything I liked. I should really wrap up the work >> a bit so I can spread the love. > > we have RBMethodDefinitions now, which are almost polymorphic to > CompiledMethod > when it comes to all inspection / reflection accesses. > > So I guess we can change that in 3.0 at some point to no longer return silly > strings...