I think it's not a good idea to dump the 3.0.x branch Many people are using that + 3.1 is still in development
On 28 Mar 2013, at 10:32, stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> wrote: > thanks Paul. > > I should say that I would have love not to have > 3.0.1. > 3.0.2 > so I'm really eager to get seaside 3.1 out > but at least something that can be marketed as movement. > > Stef > On Mar 27, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Stéphane Ducasse wrote >>> Hi guys >>> >>> we would like to use seaside to validate the VM and also make sure that >>> Seaside31. works perfectly in Pharo2.0. >>> I saw that some of you have a working configuration. Where can we find it >>> because we would like to publish it in the >>> MetaRepoForPharo20. >>> >>> Stef >> >> >> 3.1 is not released. That being said see if this set of packages works for >> you >> >> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4460862/seaside31Config.zip >> >> but they are also not official versions of anything and the official ones >> will likely be different. they are just something I cobbled together that >> seemed to work at the beginning of the month. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Looking-for-a-Seaside-3-1-Configuration-for-Pharo-2-0-tp4678580p4678638.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
