it is semantics. 
is the release, but is 2.0.596... why? because mark the version as 2.0.1 would 
be horrible pain (yep, it is a hand made process)... so, for now, we are ok 
like that :)

Esteban

On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:

> Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I made some changes in the Pharo 2.0 release (can be called 2.0.1, but 
>> well... it is 2.0.596. in fact :) 
>> 1) Nautilus keybindings settings are now the old ones by default (asked by 
>> Stef)
>> 2) Backported the fix that prevents that load FFI  crashes image (thanks to 
>> Guille)
>> 3) Backported the platform versions (thanks to... well, myself :)
>> 
>> Now, there is a problem with the page because the big "Download" button 
>> still points to the portable version, but well... nothing is perfect in life 
>> :)
>> 
>> enjoy,
>> Esteban
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
> cool. 
> For me 2.0.1 would be the "release" while 20596 would be the "build number".  
> Its useful to have these as distinct concepts.
> 
> cheers -ben
> 


Reply via email to