it is semantics. is the release, but is 2.0.596... why? because mark the version as 2.0.1 would be horrible pain (yep, it is a hand made process)... so, for now, we are ok like that :)
Esteban On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote: > Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I made some changes in the Pharo 2.0 release (can be called 2.0.1, but >> well... it is 2.0.596. in fact :) >> 1) Nautilus keybindings settings are now the old ones by default (asked by >> Stef) >> 2) Backported the fix that prevents that load FFI crashes image (thanks to >> Guille) >> 3) Backported the platform versions (thanks to... well, myself :) >> >> Now, there is a problem with the page because the big "Download" button >> still points to the portable version, but well... nothing is perfect in life >> :) >> >> enjoy, >> Esteban >> >> >> >> > cool. > For me 2.0.1 would be the "release" while 20596 would be the "build number". > Its useful to have these as distinct concepts. > > cheers -ben >