+1
Very annoying.

2013/4/4 Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com>

> On 3 April 2013 22:45, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > theres a setting to:
> >
> > - disable ENTER to accept the completion
> > - to increase the popup delay
> >
> > so I think that is invalid bug report then...
> >
>
> i tend to disagree.
> The defaults which we have now in 2.0 for autocompletion
> is breaking my workflow badly too.
>
> Yes, i can go to settings and disable/reconfigure stuff but that doesn't
> nullifying the fact, that my workflow is broken with ambiguous and
> inconsistent
> reaction(s) to my keystrokes by UI if i keep defaults.
>
> For instance i am still clueless, why 'enter' is default for
> autocompletion,
> and disabling it and enabling 'tab' simply doesn't works.
> That leaves me with the only option: keep using 'enter' for
> autocompletion, if i ever want to use it.
> We have to fix that.
>
>
> > On 2013-04-03, at 22:23, "Sean P. DeNigris" <s...@clipperadams.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From
> >>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10219/Completion-enter-on-accept-awkwardness
> >> :
> >>
> >>> The combination of enter on accept, with the current behavior to select
> >>> the first completion suggestion by default = trouble. For example:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Type "printOn: aStream"... pretty common method start
> >>> 2. Hit enter to go to the next line
> >>>
> >>> You will now have "printOn: MCDataStream" WTF!! I get burned by this
> >>> pretty regularly and it's annoying. I'm not sure what the fix should
> be...
> >>> probably no default selection in the suggestion menu, but possibly only
> >>> when enter on accept is enabled (t would require an extra key press to
> >>> complete and when do you ever type a tab in the middle of a line?)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Cheers,
> >> Sean
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/Issue-10219-Completion-enter-on-accept-awkwardness-tp4679488.html
> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>
>

Reply via email to