I like this proposal. Doru
On May 6, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > > What about logging levels? > > I like "logInfo:", "logDebug:", "logTrace:". Or maybe it is better to split > log with levels: "self log info:", "self log debug:", "self log trace:" > > Best regards, > Denis > > 2013/5/5 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> > Hi guys > > Stupidly I introduced log: a while ago to replace Transcript show:. Now is > the current situation. > > I still want to remove all the use of Transcript show: > > Now since I thought I did a mistake with log: because it overload > Integer>>log: I introduced trace: and traceCr: > > Now I do not like traceCr: because it is not a cool message. > > So what do we do: > > 1) we use crLog:, logCr: > and deprecated log: > > > 2) we use crTrace:, trace: and traceCr: > > I really prefer solution 1 but I would like to hear from you. > > Stef > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Don't give to get. Just give."
