On 2013-05-07, at 23:21, Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think it would be helpful to have those public open source licensed > projects that are not yet loaded on ss3 or smalltalk hub copied there > for posterity. Maybe make a squeaksource archive account on each > platform that does the copying. Just for the record: they won't be removed from squeaksource, the projects will just be read-only. > On 05/07/2013 08:19 AM, Andrei Vasile Chis wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue >> SqueakSource. >> Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the >> current active users to migrate their projects to the new service and >> then simply put squeaksource in read-only mode (simply exposing the >> directory structure and allowing downloads). >> >> What do you think about it ? >> Are there any good reasons to still keep SqueakSource alive? >> >> Cheers, >> The SCG Team > >
