On 15 July 2013 16:59, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Aha :). > > Ok. I tested PharoS with 1GB and I got a 800MB image running well. > > Is there really no chance of getting Cog with this feature? :) > please ,read more carefully.. :) it was error in config, which copied PharoS files over Pharo ones. And answering your question: you should have the same feature in both VMs since they sharing same C codebase.
> Doru > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 15 July 2013 15:34, Damien Cassou <damien.cas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> >> > wrote: >> >> Ok, I admit. I should read emails thoroughly :). Please ignore the >> >> second >> >> issue. Still, why is it called PharoS? >> > >> > >> > may it be because this is a StackVM and not Cog? >> >> yeah, it looks like Esteban by making configs for PharoS VM >> made a mistake and these VMs uploaded into same location as Cog ones.. >> (we fixed it already, building new VM, which will copy stuff properly) >> >> alternatively , you can download VM from build server: >> >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/VM/job/PharoVM/182/Architecture=32,Slave=vm-builder-win/ >> >> (to make sure we're talking about same VM) >> >> > >> > -- >> > Damien Cassou >> > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >> > >> > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without >> > losing enthusiasm." >> > Winston Churchill >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. >> > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
