Hi, I would be happy to blend Snapshotcello into Metacello.
Cheers, Doru On Jul 24, 2013, at 9:05 PM, "Dale K. Henrichs" <dale.henri...@gemtalksystems.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> > | To: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-...@lists.pharo.org> > | Cc: "Moose-related development" <moose-...@iam.unibe.ch>, "Any question > about pharo is welcome" > | <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> > | Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:48:27 PM > | Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] Re: [ann] snapshotcello > | > | > | On Jul 23, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Dale K. Henrichs > | <dale.henri...@gemtalksystems.com> wrote: > | > | > Stef, > | > > | > I haven't completely wrapped my brain around what SnapshotCello > | > does so I don't have an informed opinion ... the fact that you > | > found a need to invent SnapshotCello does speak volumes to the > | > fact that there is a need that is going unmet:). > | > > | > However, I don't like the fact that you end up sending a non-spec > | > message to make this work (#populateSpec:with:). Tools like > | > Versioner will not be able to rewrite a method like this correctly > | > so it is a less than satisfactory workaround to the method literal > | > limit. > | > | Indeed. May be in the future we could recreate a simple compliant > | spec driven method by interpreting the > | existing configuration trees but this requires some work. > > Absolutely and it would be work that I'd be willing to do ... From that > perspective SnapshotCello is a very good spec for what you and the Moose team > need. > > Dale > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow."
