On Nov 10, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It did not solve the issue yet :/, I will have to look into it next week.

Don't ;)
You should not touch Pharo related things and start use pomodoroes to blast 
your phd

Stef
> In any case, I think it would be unrelated to a bootstrap since FileLocator 
> is already lazily initialized. There is just the typical problem on how and
> when to update a singleton…
Ok so this is good then.

> 
> I should reopen the issue since the problem persists.
> 
> On 2013-11-10, at 12:37, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
>> Camillo
>> 
>> I read the bug entry and your explanation. 
>> Now could not we find a solution that is not based on postscript?
>> Why? because I'm thinking that soon (or later) we will bootstrap from 
>> sources and I would love to have 
>> as much as behavior inside the initialize so that we do not forget a little 
>> message and get the system shaky.
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>>>> On 09 Nov 2013, at 15:37, Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
>>>>> For double completeness ;-) The one-click download Pharo3.0-mac.zip has 
>>>>> the same problem. The included source file is in the wrong directory. It 
>>>>> should be moved out of Contents/Resources and moved into Contents/MacOS. 
>>>>> Then the one-click also runs.
>>>> 
>>>> That seems to be a regression from how it once was, so it should be fixed 
>>>> ASAP.
>>> 
>>> It was fixed and actually extended to take more source locations into 
>>> account.
>>> But somehow FileLocator is not properly initialized and thus the additional 
>>> locations
>>> are not properly resolved.
> 
> 


Reply via email to