On 2 avr. 2014, at 16:27, Mark Rizun <mri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That is really wierd:)
> 
> 
> 2014-04-02 17:17 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben <r.wob...@home.nl>:
> Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16:
>> The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for 
>> self in two lines before should and shouldnt):
>> 
>> testCellOnState
>>       | cell |
>>       cell := BlankCell new.
>>       self should: [ cell isOff ].
>>       self shouldnt:  [ cell isOn ].
>> 
>> 
> 
> You are abolute right.
> Wierd that earlier test succceed where this error also is made.

It's just because before you were subclassing BlankCell from TestCase so 
BlankCell instances were answering #should: .

> 
> Roelof
> 
> 

Reply via email to