On 2 avr. 2014, at 16:27, Mark Rizun <mri...@gmail.com> wrote: > That is really wierd:) > > > 2014-04-02 17:17 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben <r.wob...@home.nl>: > Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16: >> The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for >> self in two lines before should and shouldnt): >> >> testCellOnState >> | cell | >> cell := BlankCell new. >> self should: [ cell isOff ]. >> self shouldnt: [ cell isOn ]. >> >> > > You are abolute right. > Wierd that earlier test succceed where this error also is made.
It's just because before you were subclassing BlankCell from TestCase so BlankCell instances were answering #should: . > > Roelof > >