+ 1 Norbert
Am 26.05.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>: > Object>>#name should be removed, it is possible, I tried it once. > Most senders of #name are asking for the name of a class. > > On 26 May 2014, at 18:15, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Do I understand correctly that name is to be understood as inspectorName >> and so should never be implemented as subclass responsibility? >> >> Stephan >> > >
