ᐧ

> Hi Sven,
>
That sounds encouraging.

I am running Pharo 3.0, but I don't know how to get the release number of
Zinc. Is it stored in the class comments, or can I use monticello to get
the info?

I am not behind a proxy

By the way, using the ZnClient returns about 53K of text. The first chunk
of which is:

'
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
  <meta charset="utf-8">
  <meta content="width=300, initial-scale=1" name="viewport">
  <meta name="description" content="Google Drive is a free way to keep your
files backed up and easy to reach from any phone, tablet, or computer.
Start with 15GB of Google storage – free.">



> Hi Andy,
>
> Your URL actually does return '13' for me with Zinc following the redirect:
>
>
>
> So the question is why doesn't it work for you ?
>
> Which version of Pharo and/or Zinc are you using ?
> Are you behind a proxy ?
>
> Sven
>
> On 16 Aug 2014, at 16:55, Andy Burnett <andy.burn...@knowinnovation.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Google Apps Scripts allows me to create a webapp function that returns
> json.  For security reasons the url to call the function returns a
> redirection. For example
> >
> > Curl
> https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbyjVyXa9cYqYZg6kfSdiT8l6S0Q3LEzn6FvonoI1G1MzXeegrOB/exec
> >
> > Returns an html page with the redirection information, whereas
> >
> > curl -L
> https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbyjVyXa9cYqYZg6kfSdiT8l6S0Q3LEzn6FvonoI1G1MzXeegrOB/exec
> >
> > Returns the json value  (currently 13)
> >
> > I tried to use ZnClient to do the same thing, and I thought that
> ZnClient automatically followed redirections, but when I inspect the value
> it seems to actually return a larger html page, rather than the json.  My
> Pharo code is:
> >
> > (ZnClient new) get: '
> https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbyjVyXa9cYqYZg6kfSdiT8l6S0Q3LEzn6FvonoI1G1MzXeegrOB/exec
> '.
> >
> > Do I have to set any other options?
> >
> > Please Note: this is my first experiment with Google App Scripts, so it
> is very likely that the problem is with my script, rather than Pharo.
> However, the script does seem to be returning the correct value in the
> browser, so it might be some interaction between the two.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Andy
> > ?
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20140816/7b068587/attachment.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: Screen Shot 2014-08-16 at 17.18.11.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 105419 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20140816/7b068587/attachment.png
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-users mailing list
> Pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
> http://lists.pharo.org/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Pharo-users Digest, Vol 16, Issue 61
> *******************************************
>

Reply via email to