Now that's not strange. Thanks for info
2014-09-06 11:49 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com>: > If you missed our discussion with Marcus, Opal allowed constructs like > that until week ago. > > Uko > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:46, Mark Rizun <mri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You are right there is such a code. > And it's really strange how it compiled earlier:) > Thanks > > > 2014-09-06 11:42 GMT+03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > >> well, this is weird :) >> the error you have is usually because you have something like this: >> >> myMethod: aParameter >> … >> aParameter := something. >> … >> >> (same can happen with blocks). >> >> you cannot assign a parameter… and compiler protests if you try. >> but I wander how you could introduce the problem the first time. Compiler >> should deny that kind of construction. >> >> Anyway, your fix is to change that :) >> >> Esteban >> >> On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:39, Mark Rizun <mri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Package of my project RewriteTool. >> Here it is: >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/packages/RewriteTool >> >> >> 2014-09-06 11:33 GMT+03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: >> >>> which package? >>> >>> >>> On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:28, Mark Rizun <mri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi everyone! >>> > >>> > When loading a package via Monticello, while compiling methods it >>> gives an >>> > error: >>> > Syntax Error: Cannot store into and then a method. >>> > What does it mean? >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > Mark >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > View this message in context: >>> http://forum.world.st/Syntax-Error-Cannot-store-into-tp4776675.html >>> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com >>> . >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
