> On 19 Jan 2015, at 20:00, <jtuc...@objektfabrik.de> <jtuc...@objektfabrik.de> > wrote: > > Sven, > > I got Richard’s message about ESUG and I asked for facts. It seems you didn't > read my full post…
I did read it, it was well written and I agree with what you said. But you were too polite, you give him the benefit of the doubt. I don't think that I have to remind anyone of what ESUG means (now and in the past) for the larger Smalltalk community. I just do not even want to make that comparison, not even for the sake of the discussion. > Joachim > > Von: Sven Van Caekenberghe > Gesendet: Montag, 19. Januar 2015 19:17 > An: Any question about pharo is welcome > > > > On 19 Jan 2015, at 17:48, jtuc...@objektfabrik.de wrote: > > > > All that's been said so far is that some people do not like the use of some > > military terms, no matter where they come from and whether people know what > > these mean or not. We are not on a crusade, and this is not about > > conquering anything or anybody. > > I am sorry, Joachim, but that is not true: he just said (ok, implicitly) that > ESUG is worthless. And he said many more quite hurtful things by stating > 'facts' or comparing (as equal or unequal) or rating different projects. > > Yes, since he wrote his first 'essay', it seems that he knows more or less > what Smalltalk is, further than that I am sceptical.
