Like I said, very strange. If you can (if there is no sensitive information in included), you can make the image+changes available somewhere and I can have a look. You can mail me privately.
Else I hope you can recover your work. > On 20 Jan 2015, at 14:27, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users > <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote: > > > Date: 20 Jan 2015 14:23:51 CET > From: Davide Varvello <varve...@yahoo.com> > To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org > Subject: Re: "Improper store into indexable object" and weird variable names > > > Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >>> On 20 Jan 2015, at 10:00, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < > >> pharo-users@.pharo > >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> Date: 20 Jan 2015 09:56:45 CET >>> From: Davide Varvello < > >> varvello@ > >> > >>> To: > >> pharo-users@.pharo > >>> Subject: Re: "Improper store into indexable object" and weird variable >>> names >>> >>> >>> Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >>>>> On 19 Jan 2015, at 22:46, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < >>> >>>> pharo-users@.pharo >>> >>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Date: 19 Jan 2015 22:43:13 CET >>>>> From: Davide Varvello < >>> >>>> varvello@ >>> >>>> > >>>>> To: >>> >>>> pharo-users@.pharo >>> >>>>> Subject: Re: "Improper store into indexable object" and weird variable >>>>> names >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> H Sven, >>>>> I didn't move nor rename any of them. In fact some methods have t1, t2, >>>>> t3, >>>>> ... but some others have real variable names. >>>> >>>> That is weird. Any details on which work and which do not ? System code >>>> or >>>> your code ? >>> >>> Both, my code and system code. Looking at changes it seems it lost all >>> code >>> before 7:01:06 pm CET of yesterday (see http://imgur.com/V8eis9Z), I can >>> try >>> to restore from my backup, but I'm wondering what happened. >> >> It has been years that I developed in 2.0, but I very vaguely remember >> having seen something similar. Going back and recovering from backup seems >> the only choice. >> >> I find it hard to believe that, say some Collection methods are OK, and >> some say String methods are decompiled, and some of your own code is OK >> and some is not - totally arbitrary ? Is it even constant ? > > It's weird. Look at here: http://i.imgur.com/p5kbECh.png > > Davide > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Improper-store-into-indexable-object-and-weird-variable-names-tp4800514p4800625.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
