> > People read the mailing list via other means, too > (Nabble, for example).
Or maybe there are user-only on Nabble. But I guess not so much ? Or not more that in Pharo-users. Pierre 2015-01-26 17:59 GMT-03:00 Pierre CHANSON <chans.pie...@gmail.com>: > thanks! > Around 500, it's still impressive. > > I guess I can count a little bit less to have a number on Pharo devs, > Pharo active community. > > But it is difficult to put a real number on pharo users: > If we consider that all Pharo devs (or almost) are in the both lists, (And > I guess this is not so false because my feeling is that Pharo devs tend to > help new Pharo users) it means there is no Pharo user-only, or there is no > Pharo user-only in the mailing list... > And at first I would have thought that begin to use Pharo, comes with > applying to the mailing list (because there is not a lot of tutorials and > documentations for any kind of Pharo applications all arround the net). > > 2015-01-26 11:43 GMT-03:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>: > > >> > On 26 Jan 2015, at 15:39, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > probably the biggest reason is that the list has been quite inactive >> till now. Another is that many of pharo users find it easy to contribute >> back to pharo because of the nature of the enviroment and the third , the >> community is just to small to have a sizable pharo-user list. Personally I >> am surprised that Pharo-dev has not much more. >> > >> People read the mailing list via other means, too >> (Nabble, for example). >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >
