> On 10 Mar 2015, at 14:25, Joachim Tuchel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sounds like a bad naming to me. I don't see why withIndexDo is any better. It > even contradicts the order of the arguments. And it is Proprietary to Pharo. >
No, if you look a the timeStamp it was done in 1997 by Dan. > Joachim > > > Am 10.03.2015 um 13:39 schrieb Sanjay Minni <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >> Yes usually I have to open the code and see, use intuition or write a sample >> code to find out >> incidentally here I also have to figure out which is the current and which >> is the deprecated version ... well thats it >> >> sanjay >> >> >> --- >> Sanjay Minni >> +91-9900-902902 >> http://in.linkedin.com/in/sanjayminni <http://in.linkedin.com/in/sanjayminni> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Thierry Goubier [via Smalltalk] <[hidden >> email] <x-msg://6/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4810945&i=0>> wrote: >> And one has to guess that elementAndIndexBlock means >> >> [:each :i | ... ] ? (and of course not [:i :each | ... ] ) >> >> I'm allways looking for senders with that type of code ;) arguments to >> blocks are usually not documented. >> >> Thierry >> >> 2015-03-10 13:27 GMT+01:00 Peter Uhnák <[hidden email] >> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4810931&i=0>>: >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Joachim Tuchel <[hidden email] >> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4810931&i=1>> wrote: >> #doWithIndex: ? >> >> doWithIndex: elementAndIndexBlock >> "Use the new version with consistent naming" >> ^ self withIndexDo: elementAndIndexBlock >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> below: >> http://forum.world.st/when-iterating-over-a-collection-how-to-determine-the-current-objects-index-tp4810920p4810931.html >> >> <http://forum.world.st/when-iterating-over-a-collection-how-to-determine-the-current-objects-index-tp4810920p4810931.html> >> To unsubscribe from when iterating over a collection how to determine the >> current objects index, click here >> <applewebdata://B2A91C9C-780D-40B2-9C35-3155BCAFCB80>. >> NAML >> <http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >> --- >> Regards, Sanjay >> >> View this message in context: Re: when iterating over a collection how to >> determine the current objects index >> <http://forum.world.st/when-iterating-over-a-collection-how-to-determine-the-current-objects-index-tp4810920p4810945.html> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive >> <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html> at Nabble.com >> <http://nabble.com/>.
