> Am 02.04.2015 um 13:55 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > > >> On 02 Apr 2015, at 13:13, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name >> <mailto:norb...@hartl.name>> wrote: >> >> >>> Am 02.04.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:emaring...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> I don't know if you need full fledged access or just to read a few tables. >>> >>> If it the latest you can use PostgreSQL Foreign Data Wrappers (FDW) and >>> access the pgsql instance using the existing PGv2 driver. >>> >>> I know it might look convoluted, and maybe it is, but you avoid using DBX. >>> >>> >> I would also avoid using oracle which is a prerequisite, right? :) So DBX is >> to avoid? Sorry, I didn't care very much about SQL engines the last years. > > why DBX is to avoid?
I don't know. I read the sentence "I know it might look convoluted, and maybe it is, but you avoid using DBX." as avoiding DBX is something positive. So I want to know as well. > in linux, it is your only chance for connecting to oracle (in windows you > could also use odbc). > and it should be working, AFAIK > I'm fine with using DBX as long as it works. I understood also that it is one of the higher prioritized tasks for the consortium. Norbert > Esteban > >> >> Norbert >> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Ps: FDW are amazing. >>> >>> El abr 2, 2015 6:07 AM, "Norbert Hartl" <norb...@hartl.name >>> <mailto:norb...@hartl.name>> escribió: >>> I see from time to time topics like SQL popping up. Most of the time >>> DBXTalk seems to be a requirement. It is also something that is considered >>> necessary for a lot of people. Now have the need to access an oracle >>> database. Is that possible? And if yes does it also work on linux? >>> >>> Norbert >> >
