Of course, how could I have missed it before, thank you both :) Jan
Blondeau Vincent wrote > Hello, > > You should but a block after "and:". > If you don't, the instruction will be always executed... > The block represents a kind of conditional action. > > So if you want to do it works : > false and: [ Transcript open ] > > Hoping that it will help, > > Best, > Vincent BLONDEAU Peter Uhnák wrote > Hi, > > that's because you need to pass a block, since you want to postpone to > execution. > i.e. false and: [Transcript open]. (otherwise the binary operation > Transcript open will take precedence over keyword false and:) > You can always look at the implementation of those things — I always learn > something from it. :) > > »and: alternativeBlock« > > Peter -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Non-evaluating-and-or-tp4817211p4817419.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
