Am 05.04.15 um 12:34 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe:
the Dictionary>>postCopy comment reads:
"Must copy the associations, or later store will affect both the original and 
the copy
You interpret the comment incorrectly: it talks about the association itself, not the 
value that it holds. Without Dictionary>>#postCopy associations end up being 
shared between the original and the copy; when you overwrite an existing entry in the 
original dictionary, you would also change the copy - which you do not want.

You seem to be expecting that the values that you put in should also be copied, 
but that is your responsibility, not that of the data structure. Think about 
it, this copying does not happen in arrays or ordered collections either.

Does that make sense ?
Yes, thanks

--
Hartmut Krasemann

Königsberger Str. 41 c

D 22869 Schenefeld

Tel. 040.8307097

Mobil 0171.6451283

krasem...@acm.org


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to