2015-06-30 9:34 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote: > > > > > > 2015-06-25 18:41 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> is there any image (as in picture) processing library in the likes of > >> Python's PIL(http://effbot.org/imagingbook/image.htm), > >> > >> or even (highly unlikely) something like OpenCV (http://opencv.org/)? > > > > > > Not that I know of. > > I was interested at one time with the same topic. > > > Juan Vuletich had a nice PhotoSqueak project (squeak 1 or 2?) > > > http://www.jvuletich.org/Squeak/PhotoSqueak/PhotoSqueakGallery/PhotoSqueakGallery.html > > I ask Juan about this one, but apparently this is not open-source. > > > There is Smagick > > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~StefanReichhart/Smagick/ > > > > (not a library on its own, but an interface to imagemagick) > > > > I think there was another squeak/imagemagic project but I don't remember. > > > > It would be great to have something like imagemagick, but implemented > > entirely in smalltalk. > > There was some experiments done by Luc : > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~LucFabresse/OpenCV this repo only contains some highly experimental code that do not work anymore :-( Luc > > > There is also some basic image processing in VirtualGPU : > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~ronsaldo/VirtualGPU > > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > >
