‘cause catalog does not takes duplicates, just the highest repository. Esteban
> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:34, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote: > > Why does it show that QA has only conf. for pharo 5 if it also has one for > Pharo 4? > > Uko > >> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the >> styling… still a lot to do but is looking better and better: >> http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh) >> >> But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your >> configurations with catalog information as described here: >> http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers >> Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please >> copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under >> “Unstable” tag. >> >> The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT >> of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), >> that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be >> used :( >> >> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS! >> >> cheers, >> Esteban > >
