> On 28 Feb 2016, at 02:04, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote:
> 
> On 26/02/16 20:30, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
>> I was thinking it would still be cool to have some kind of library that
>> will help us boost the speed of pharo . So I was thinking about a C
>> inliner which is far easier than an Assembly inliner (see AsmJIT) I also
>> found TinyC
> 
> The first thing to test is if TinyC is actually faster than Pharo.

yes!
but it can be a nice addition to gain part of what is lost with the removal of 
ASMJIT (not that anyone was using it, but well... :P)


> 
> Stephan
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to