> On 28 Feb 2016, at 02:04, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: > > On 26/02/16 20:30, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: >> I was thinking it would still be cool to have some kind of library that >> will help us boost the speed of pharo . So I was thinking about a C >> inliner which is far easier than an Assembly inliner (see AsmJIT) I also >> found TinyC > > The first thing to test is if TinyC is actually faster than Pharo.
yes! but it can be a nice addition to gain part of what is lost with the removal of ASMJIT (not that anyone was using it, but well... :P) > > Stephan > > >