Thank you Dale, this is very useful! On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Dale Henrichs < dale.henri...@gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
> I need to proof read my posts more carefully... > > On 07/14/2016 12:49 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > > > On a slightly different topic, Alistair Grant ran into a bug involving > Metacello and how it semantic version numbers[7] a couple > > months ago and this release includes a bug fix ... the bug was related to > the fact that the parser was too lenient and did throw an > > On a slightly different topic, Alistair Grant ran into a bug involving > Metacello and how it *PARSES* semantic version numbers[7] a couple months > ago and this release includes a bug fix ... the bug was related to the fact > that the parser was too lenient and did *NOT* throw an > > error for some forms of invalid Semantic version numbers ... with this fix > an error is thrown ... of course it is entirely possible that there are > ConfigurationOfs out in the wild that "depend upon the old behavior" so if > you get an "invalid version number" error while working with a > configuration and discover that it is not practical to redefine the version > numbers to conform to the semantic version number format then you can add > the following method to the ConfigurationOf and the old, buggy version of > the parser will be used: > > versionNumberClass > ^ MetacelloOldSemanticVersionNumber > > >
