Hi,

I just adapted the latest version of the Cryptography package in
SqueakSource (Cryptography-rww.49) and removed everything that was
already in the Pharo 5.0 image and modified what was necessary to have
all the tests passing.

There is still a pending organization of the Cryptography classes and
packages per se, but this should be the reference implementation in
Pharo.

http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Cryptography/Cryptography/

Name: Cryptography-EstebanMaringolo.50
Author: EstebanMaringolo
Time: 15 September 2016, 2:17:35.340244 pm
UUID: 903f4f9d-166d-49c6-bf2e-31ebfcfe3c26
Ancestors: Cryptography-rww.49

It's weird (to say it softly) to upload a Cryptography package using
plain text user credentials over an insecure HTTP connection.
#TheIrony

Regards,

Esteban A. Maringolo


2016-09-12 19:45 GMT-03:00 Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com>:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Who is the author of the to-be announced library?
>
>
> I guess Stef was being deliberately vague allowing the author's convenience
> to make the announcement.
>
> cheers -ben
>
>>
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>>
>>
>> 2016-09-12 15:17 GMT-03:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr>:
>> > Hi esteban
>> >
>> > I know that there will be an announce about bitcoin library in Pharo so
>> > I
>> > can put you in contact with the author.
>> >
>> > Stef
>> >
>> >
>> > Le 12/9/16 à 14:42, Esteban A. Maringolo a écrit :
>> >
>> >> 2016-09-11 14:26 GMT-03:00 Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Years ago when Squeaksource was "going away"  I made a copy of its
>> >>> Cryptography repo here:
>> >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Cryptography/Cryptography
>> >>
>> >> I saw it before posting to the list, but the latest commit is from
>> >> three years go.
>> >>
>> >> I'm reading a book about Bitcoin/Blockchains and I want to follow the
>> >> examples using my favorite language instead of Python.
>> >> Probably not all the algorithms will be there, particularly ECC, but
>> >> at least the ones for hashing should.
>> >>
>> >> Regards!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Esteban A. Maringolo
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to