For me, Pillar was a package in Pier, and Pier was a tool that I used for 
all my presentations, prototyping, and small or short-lived community and 
not-for-profit projects.


I do not get why you cannot use Pharo for that.




Le 17/11/16 à 02:04, Jupiter Jones a écrit :
Hey Stephane,

It would be nice to see Pillar return to being a cross platform project as 
well. One of the beautiful things about Seaside/Magritte/Pier was it’s 
compatibility across many dialects of Smalltalk. The “develop in Pharo and 
deploy in GemStone” was a big draw for me :) One of my clients uses VW so it 
was great to have these projects there as well.
Yes but at the end of the day. You see we cannot work for free and in addition 
got constraints that are dragging us behind.
Absolutely! Luckily the hard work of cross-compatability has already been done 
for Pier. I’m just hoping we can keep the parts of Pillar on which Pier is 
reliant working across dialects - Pharo and GemStone at least. From memory, the 
only thing that made it hard was PRTParametrizable.

I imagine very few of us are being paid for the contributions we make. In my 
case, it’s only when I have a paid project that allows me to work in Smalltalk, 
that I can invest some of that paid time in contributing towards the packages 
I’m using for that project.

I also feel my smalltalk-ability isn’t up to the standard of so many of the 
amazing people contributing, which makes me a little reticent to get involved 
in the more complex projects.

I will see if the trait usage make sense and can be removed. But you see if 
everything we do has to be compatible better be dead.
Maybe not a matter of code or die, but certainly a matter of style and most 
likely a commitment to more pain. it is (sometimes much) harder working with 
community projects since it takes working with that community -  and everyone 
has their own use case, and at least three opinions. :)

I’ve experienced this many time in non-software projects. It may take a little 
longer to get there, but it’s definitely worth the extra pain it in the end.

I would prefer to see GS having an infrastructure to load Pharo kernels. We are 
pushing the bootstrap for this reasons.
Dale and the GemStone team are doing a great job moving towards that ideal. 
Their constraints are even greater since they have a large commercial install 
base supporting many platforms. We should be able to be more flexible and 
dynamic

Because you see Pharo will use more and more slots because they are really 
really cool and powerful.
What do you do with Pillar? Because I write books, slides, and websites so this 
is an important piece of software for me.
For me, Pillar was a package in Pier, and Pier was a tool that I used for all 
my presentations, prototyping, and small or short-lived community and 
not-for-profit projects.

I’d like to see Pier get some love - it’s an awesome tool. How can I help?
Join and hack.
I’d love to! I noticed that the issue tracker and other Pillar related stuff is 
now on GitHub which is awesome. Is there any chance that the Smalltalk project 
could also move there? It would make it easier to fork and hack and make 
versions available to test before deciding what might be valuable pushed back 
to the core project.

Thanks for all your excellent work with Pillar - not to mention everything else!

Have fun!

Jupiter



Reply via email to