> Am 05.01.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Sabine Manaa <manaa.sab...@gmail.com>: > > @Norbert, concerning your last post, ip4/ip6: is there any disadvantage when > choosing your option1 (using 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost) instead of the > others? > No, even if you would make spesenfuchs.de <http://spesenfuchs.de/> reachable via ipv6 it would be just a purely internal configuration. Pharo opens only a ipv4 socket so there is no disadvantage in specifying so
> @Norbert, I have Problems with the seaside mailing list. My posts reach the > list online but don't go out by mail. When I used it in the past, I did not > get response (because people read the mailing list by mail and not by going > to http://forum.world.st <http://forum.world.st/>), so I used the Pharo > Mailinglist by intent, sorry: -) I couldn't read the seaside list because I'm not subscribed. Well, now I am. Good luck, Norbert
