I've used ENVY for a couple of years, and marginally used Store. Store is nothing compared with ENVY, ENVY is far superior. Store is like Monticello, but as such it lacks the "Configuration Map" part of it, that is offered by Metacello in Pharo/Squeak/GemStone.
However I find ENVY to be too cumbersome for an agile way of working. I found Dolphin Smalltalk X6/7 using PAX source format which is file based VCS friendly working with Git to be a very good fit, and we used it in a team of up to 10 commiters to the same repository. Monticello together with Metacello offers a very good balance, with integrated tools that enables you to merge and understand the changes. I haven't used Iceberg yet. Esteban A. Maringolo 2017-02-15 20:53 GMT-03:00 Brad Selfridge <bsselfri...@gmail.com>: > I have worked with VASmalltalk for 20 years and this included projects > utilizing 10-15 developers. VASmalltalk uses Envy Manager as its VCS. Envy, > in my opinion, is far superior to anything on the market today where it > concerns code management. It has open editions, scratch editions, versions, > application packages, sub-application packages, merges, and doffs. However, > it was built to be used in an internal organization. It is not usable for > open source Smalltalk VCS projects such as Git. I believe that Visualworks > uses a RDBMS product called Store that is similar to Envy. Both of these are > commercial Smalltalks, however. > > > > ----- > Brad Selfridge > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Team-programming-with-Smalltalk-tp4934508p4934514.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
