Yes, I can understand that, but I will have to practice more with Smalltalk to comprehend better.
Still I think there are some objects used by large bits of the application that would benefit the design if they have it's creation decoupled and somehow organized, but I am convinced that a simple service locator would do the job :) On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:29 AM, aryehof <pharo...@aryeh.sent.com> wrote: > Consider that in Java, one can /only /achieve polymorphic behavior across > objects by using /interfaces /or /inheritance/. In Smalltalk one can > achieve polymorphic behavior across objects just by *having them understand > the same message*. > > The need to have complex schemes for the wiring of objects in Java is a > consequence of this. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Wiring- > objects-IoC-and-Service-Locator-tp4949280p4951174.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
